Stephen Colebourne has done an amazing job in explaining Sun’s violations of the JSPA and why it’s important to the ASF and open software. This is a must read for anyone interested in the issue of shipping open or free Java software.
There’s a lot of commentary – both pro and con – over the ASF’s open letter to Sun about the JSPA and Sun’s inappropriate field of use restrictions on the JCK that would be provided for Apache Harmony. It seems that much of the commentary is missing the true issues, either from not understanding the true the details, or because people or organizations have their own agendas to promote.
By adding this clause, it meant that the tested code would need to contain an additional clause over and above the standard Apache license. A clause that would be invalid for any open source software as defined by the OSI. To be clear, this FOU clause would be an issue for any open source group trying to implement the Java SE specification. – S. Colebourne
Here are some resources that are worth reading about the issue:
- Stephen’s excellent graphical overview
- This shows clear pictures of how Sun inserts a field of use restriction clause to block Apache Harmony.
- Stephen’s overview of IP throughout the JCP process
- This shows how the JCP is supposed to safeguard and provide open licensing of IP within any specification, ensuring that independent vendors can implement the specifications.
- The ASF’s Open Letter to Sun
- This is the official position of the ASF, and while it’s an important document, it’s not as easy to read as other sources. There is a FAQ from the ASF available which offers some insight.
- Geir’s commentary on the current state of the issue
- The ASF’s own Geir Magnusson Jr., VP of JCP, and Dalibor Topic duel over the topic, alternately attempting to sidestep the issue or lock horns straight on.
- The actual JCP vote on JSP-316: Java EE 6
- While the ASF is the only organization that actually voted No, you really need to read the comments from other voters, as well as evaluate the Abstain votes.
- The JCP’s own procedure documentation, including a glossary
- The JCP itself has governance rules. If you really want to understand the background about how the JCP works, there’s a lot more history; in this case it’s really the foundation of how JCP rules that is at issue with what Sun has been doing.
There are a wide variety of content sources for the ASF and ApacheCon, including a number of official ones (i.e. from moderated sources or from specific PMCs or ASF officers) as well as a stunning array of unofficial ones (from members, committers, and others associated with the ASF).
Note that the many projects, Incubator Podlings, and Labs hosted at the ASF have their own feeds and lists as well; this list only includes ASF-wide resources or ApacheCon-specific resources that have an obvious feed.
Official Feeds related to ApacheCon
Official Feeds related to the ASF
Tags related to the ASF
- #apachecon, #meetup, #barcamp
- hashtags for Twitter, etc.
- ApacheCon, ApacheConEU09
- Blog and photo tags (Also see our flickr groups)(per-show tags generally follow the format of [US|EU][08|09])
- A tag most often associated with technical issues about the HTTP Server project, although sometimes about the ASF overall
- An overall tag sometimes associated with the ASF and sometimes… not.
This is a sample post for testing typography. Yes, I’m vain; I take forever to pick a theme.
- Ordered lists
- I tend to over-use them; I should really work on editing structure more
- Three is a good number
And now for something different
O Fortuna, velut Luna statu variabilis, semper crescis aut decrescis; vita detestabilis nunc obdurat et tunc curat ludo mentis aciem; egestatem, potestatem, dissolvit ut glaciem.
Sors immanis et inanis, rota tu volubilis, status malus, vana salus semper dissolubilis; obumbrata et velata mihi quoque niteris; nunc per ludum dorsum nudum fero tui sceleris.
Sors salutis et virtutis mihi nunc contraria; est affectus et defectus semper in angaria. Hac in hora sine mora cordae pulsum tangite! Quod per sortem sternit fortem, mecum omnes plangite!
A personal preference
- Shane likes definition lists
- A simple and structural way to introduce a topic, and then describe it. Somehow, his brain thinks that way.
- Ut eu lacus.
- Aliquam erat volutpat. Integer eget diam et quam pulvinar bibendum.
Heading 4 Is Only barely smaller than 3
Fusce eu lacus et risus interdum vestibulum. Proin a nisi. Phasellus ac nisi. In urna. Integer eu ligula at massa porta dignissim. Etiam vitae libero pharetra felis semper luctus. Nam semper. Maecenas non risus sed elit imperdiet laoreet. Ut eros elit, commodo interdum, aliquam in, ullamcorper sed, urna.
Get serious, who really uses H5?
# Every planet needs a [Planet] section
# face = foo.png
# faceheight = 32
At level 6 you might as well use >small<
Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
Add in some e.e.cummings, and that’d break the test!